This is how you try to educate the masses. We therefore underline the sentence of the do you as you see it? Where everything is relative and in addition it can be true or false. But in the case of the written language that brings us to a reflection therefore of this cognitive process is not only visual, also could lead us to the conclusion that are not credible any of the media (postmodern nihilism). As our Social Anthropology consultant tells us to read these news one is left with the idea that all are individual beings but are part of the undifferentiated herd of sheep, in part because the ads or the industry or the powers see us like that. Hopefully in the future, consider also, how is that people we resist and seek alternatives to this ideology of consumption that makes us believe that we will succeed with effort and discipline. Discursive psychologists and psychologists are social psychologists who study social reality as a text, and there is nothing better than compare as they build the realities in this case news of two of power different sectors, even though they are built by men and women belonging to the World of knowledge, also including the absence of news.
We also note that the premises of values and certainties of the illustration have been changed and are changing not based on the objectivity of science but of the subjectivity of the scientist or the man of knowledge working for someone in particular. Despite the different definitions of the speech and the two chosen newspaper with different conceptions about his analysis, none of them can pretend to be the definitive (relativization). Each one meets the own concerns of the / different as / as authors and emphasizes different aspects. Each journal focuses on the interest in how people constructed reality, (in what they hope to count them), have in mind the kind of language to construct reality know that understanding is a key factor in the social task, i.e., seek to void or relativize the individual psychological notions and converted the language in a speech that contribute to the order or Social conflict, as used words for building purposes and to obtain certain consequences: promises, threats: speech builds our vivid reality said Weherell and Potter 1996 less evil, that some readers (who aren’t serving salary nor ideals–at least not transcribed as well) we have abstracted the discourse of the newspapers giving us reasons for reflection and consideration and not always socially imposed on individual consciousness.