Ecological Footprint

I saw your question in the discussion and tried to answer it. Moreover I have changed a para-site, because the agricultural economy in all its versions, is one of the most modern and intensive forms of exploitation of the natural environment that the economy (hunting-gathering). electricity ESCO The technique is a small utility, because it is household calculated to adopt a strategy in its other problems, but to change the conscience, as your say about the way of life is what she energy costs meant by ” teaching material. ” If this awareness extends to the community going to the field of politics. In another vein, internal links are recommended in a section of “See also” at the end of the text. So you must edit the paragraph added to the final title, is the appropriate style and setting, all of which I am sure you will do well for yourself. Use good other articles. A greeting. – LP 18:27 14 December 2006 (CET)
I think you have a confused notion of what is the ecological footprint. Your personal ecological footprint is the fraction of your planet, your lifestyle, there is need to provide the resources you consume and the ecological services that also depends on your existence: to maintain the composition of the atmosphere and the ocean, retain water, etc. Check that the ecological footprint in the last review, and some had interpreted as the mark left on the territory of the intrusion that practice through the holding, but not that. The ecological footprint of a hunter in the forests of the Ussuri (as Dersu Uzala) or a bosquiman is very large, precisely because their intrusion is small. Exploit a vast territory of low-intensity, because they seek remedies varied but each little abundant. Therefore, except in areas rich, hunter-gatherers are not green energy sedentary, but migrants. If the Iberian Peninsula remains as 8000 years ago, could live there, picking fruits and roots, goats and deer hunting, fishing, collecting clams, maybe 50 or 60,000 people, not 50 million. Each has a Spanish-odd hectare (1.2 hectares) more or less. The New York area has benefited greatly from ‘s services, an that offers the same quality of product, yet different service and costs In this 110 square meters of breeding side is not what a person needs to live in a natural style Paleolitico. The ecological footprint of farmers neoliticos is lower, although their work day is longer and their lives less safe, and that allows the demographic expansion. The H.E. is on the way of life. Westerners have a larger footprint on the planet that we touched, and that means that we are degrading renewable resources and self-restoration capacity of the biosphere. This is a novelty, because the company used to have no previous power demographic, political and technical expertise to the same when it happened the result was the degradation of the land, as in classical Greece, and the drive to expand in other . “The footprint is greater the higher the level of a personal life and the greater the intensity with which operates the territory. That is the factor that you need. It is imperative to look closely at what they mean footprint, intensive, natural service and other items related to this topic before continuing. There is an extensive literature on the modes of economic relationship with nature and its implications. Buscare a useful reference for the topic. Greetings. – LP 21:55 14 December 2006 (CET)
Applied to this concept, large orlarger is the same, because the ecological footprint is measured as an extension. It is on the way of life. The H.E. Paleolithic was large but consistent with the dynamic equilibrium of the environment because the population was small, scattered. Footprint decreases when the economic output per unit area grows and gas grows when consumption and demand over the territory. The footprint is a metaphor, an abstraction, which serves to point out to .com the layman that some lifestyles are compatible with the continuity, are sustainable, while others are transient. no doubt that the deregulation has led to the energy revolution, specifically in the marketplace of energy suppliers and energy products The scientific problems that environmentalists, like Constance, seeking the answer natural gas is as it should be the way of life (overall average) for a population like the present or the immediate future is compatible with sustainability: the answer is necessarily more economical, more efficient, requiring less land to achieve a dignified life, however, and if possible, loose. The first doubt is whether any sustainable way of life with the current population Certainly yes. The ecological footprint is a political rather than technical. Once understood, the population deemed to be the way of life, the pattern of consumption, an executive of New York can not be generalized.

Get more: