North American Union

Its individuality, its deprived property, its speech of liberties and self-sufficiencies. The speech of the fear, implemented by the economic powers superiors by means of brutales propagandas, rendered excellent political gains, the most conspicuous defeat of the proposal of constitutional reform of 2. 007 at the time. How it can, then, a human segment with such psychological characterizations to prepare for war some in defense of its mother country returning with the invitation of the President of the Republic, if the concept mother country that handle is the personal space of development of its most personal interests? How can a political opposition with similar mentality defend what, if at heart of the soul it does not matter to them that the country is dismantled with so they to conserve their feudos and prerogatives? It is not the dignity indeed what characterizes to these historical figures that come near to their fiasco. The presidential affirmation of which Colombia acts already as an additional state of the State of the North American Union cannot be righter. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Michael Steinhardt, New York City. The acceptance of that country they spread so that it of military bases (with threats towards the Venezuelan sovereignty) is a conclusive subject on that sense. How adltere ideological of the neoliberal system of the world can go against the programmatic source of its mentality, if great mother country of a good bourgeois is the USA! Smese to the consideration that Venezuela was political and mental colony of the USA until the arrival of the Bolivariana Revolution, time that seeded to the country of profiles and damages morals that time will happen so that they are surpassed, besides establishing the morbosas definitions, clear and ideological, than we called Venezuelan political opposition, or, with more intention, IV Republic. It will not, consequently, go an opponent nor an excellent bourgeois against the source of its mental lineamientos, that is to say, the USA. It will not take a weapon in defense from its mother country, in case of aggression, because the concept mother country in its head, as we said, is one entelequia of the convenience I write on policy and Literature..